<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Traditional &amp; Social Media Collide &#8211; A Lesson From John Byrne</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storyassistant.com/2009/05/a-lesson-from-john-byrne/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storyassistant.com/2009/05/a-lesson-from-john-byrne/</link>
	<description>Helping You Build Relationships</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 11:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Costa DeVault &#187; Blog Archive &#187; BusinessWeek Talks Social Media</title>
		<link>http://storyassistant.com/2009/05/a-lesson-from-john-byrne/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Costa DeVault &#187; Blog Archive &#187; BusinessWeek Talks Social Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storyassistant.com/?p=385#comment-282</guid>
		<description>[...] editor-in-chief John Byrne&#8217;s Twitter account is often cited as an example of a traditional media person getting and embracing social media. (He is one of 30+ tweeting BusinessWeek [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] editor-in-chief John Byrne&#8217;s Twitter account is often cited as an example of a traditional media person getting and embracing social media. (He is one of 30+ tweeting BusinessWeek [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mullen</title>
		<link>http://storyassistant.com/2009/05/a-lesson-from-john-byrne/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mullen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storyassistant.com/?p=385#comment-270</guid>
		<description>One obvious way they&#039;ve blended was mentioned here - traditional journalists who are extending/migrating their presence and work online. Here&#039;s a micro example of how that&#039;s beneficial to PR people...

We were working with a BusinessWeek reporter this past summer on a story. We reached out to him with the pitch and he was interested. The problem is that the opportunity to write the story was cut by his editor. But, the reporter also blogs for BusinessWeek. So he wrote a post on the story. Instead of missing out on an opportunity altogether, our client still had its story featured. Sure, it wasn&#039;t in the print edition. But the online version lives forever and is searchable by Google. Some may argue that&#039;s as good, if not better.

Traditional media won&#039;t evaporate into nothingness. It will still be around, though the landscape will look different. What&#039;s happening is evolution. For the record, it&#039;s happened before. And, I&#039;m guessing it will happen again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One obvious way they&#8217;ve blended was mentioned here &#8211; traditional journalists who are extending/migrating their presence and work online. Here&#8217;s a micro example of how that&#8217;s beneficial to PR people&#8230;</p>
<p>We were working with a BusinessWeek reporter this past summer on a story. We reached out to him with the pitch and he was interested. The problem is that the opportunity to write the story was cut by his editor. But, the reporter also blogs for BusinessWeek. So he wrote a post on the story. Instead of missing out on an opportunity altogether, our client still had its story featured. Sure, it wasn&#8217;t in the print edition. But the online version lives forever and is searchable by Google. Some may argue that&#8217;s as good, if not better.</p>
<p>Traditional media won&#8217;t evaporate into nothingness. It will still be around, though the landscape will look different. What&#8217;s happening is evolution. For the record, it&#8217;s happened before. And, I&#8217;m guessing it will happen again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Brown</title>
		<link>http://storyassistant.com/2009/05/a-lesson-from-john-byrne/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 14:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storyassistant.com/?p=385#comment-268</guid>
		<description>It never fails to amaze me when people continuously talk about the &quot;death&quot; of media (just an FYI, I&#039;m not putting you in this bracket, Matt).

So much similar talk has been said for years on other mediums - vinyl, video cassettes, radio, etc.

The thing is, media by its very nature is adaptable. Much like anything - there&#039;s very little that is set in stone.

So, the thing people should be looking at is the users of the medium, not the medium itself.

If something is dying or struggling, is it really its fault or the proponents of it? Usually it&#039;s the latter, and they&#039;re the ones that need to adapt new mindsets.

Great examples of that here - but they&#039;re still a relativly small amount. Here&#039;s to more seeing the light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It never fails to amaze me when people continuously talk about the &#8220;death&#8221; of media (just an FYI, I&#8217;m not putting you in this bracket, Matt).</p>
<p>So much similar talk has been said for years on other mediums &#8211; vinyl, video cassettes, radio, etc.</p>
<p>The thing is, media by its very nature is adaptable. Much like anything &#8211; there&#8217;s very little that is set in stone.</p>
<p>So, the thing people should be looking at is the users of the medium, not the medium itself.</p>
<p>If something is dying or struggling, is it really its fault or the proponents of it? Usually it&#8217;s the latter, and they&#8217;re the ones that need to adapt new mindsets.</p>
<p>Great examples of that here &#8211; but they&#8217;re still a relativly small amount. Here&#8217;s to more seeing the light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Palony</title>
		<link>http://storyassistant.com/2009/05/a-lesson-from-john-byrne/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Palony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 13:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storyassistant.com/?p=385#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Matt - Excellent post. Your answer to the question of why we are in the social media space got me thinking. The evolution of media does demand that social media be part of the mix, but we should also be aware that what we now call social media will one day be known as traditional media. Simply put, if we fail to understand how the market is accessing and consuming information, then we fail to serve our clients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt &#8211; Excellent post. Your answer to the question of why we are in the social media space got me thinking. The evolution of media does demand that social media be part of the mix, but we should also be aware that what we now call social media will one day be known as traditional media. Simply put, if we fail to understand how the market is accessing and consuming information, then we fail to serve our clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Kay</title>
		<link>http://storyassistant.com/2009/05/a-lesson-from-john-byrne/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 01:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storyassistant.com/?p=385#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Matt- I love this post for a number of reasons, one being that you highlighted John Byrne, who is one of my favorite media people to connect with on Twitter. Unfortunately a lot of media feel slighted that a great number of their Twitter followers are PR people like us.  I have long stood by the fact that I got into this business due to a passion for the news and I follow reporters to keep close tabs on what they are writing about and what makes them tick. John recognizes me as both a reader and a PR person, which I appreciate. 

There are many examples of traditional journalists using social media, Twitter in particular, giving consumers and press people the chance to connect with them in a much more personal and genuine way. A lot of them take the time to chat with us on the Journchat chat on Twitter started by Sarah Evans as well. Many also have blogs and welcome our feedback and respond to us there through comments. It’s a huge benefit for everyone, because social media provides such a heightened opportunity for conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt- I love this post for a number of reasons, one being that you highlighted John Byrne, who is one of my favorite media people to connect with on Twitter. Unfortunately a lot of media feel slighted that a great number of their Twitter followers are PR people like us.  I have long stood by the fact that I got into this business due to a passion for the news and I follow reporters to keep close tabs on what they are writing about and what makes them tick. John recognizes me as both a reader and a PR person, which I appreciate. </p>
<p>There are many examples of traditional journalists using social media, Twitter in particular, giving consumers and press people the chance to connect with them in a much more personal and genuine way. A lot of them take the time to chat with us on the Journchat chat on Twitter started by Sarah Evans as well. Many also have blogs and welcome our feedback and respond to us there through comments. It’s a huge benefit for everyone, because social media provides such a heightened opportunity for conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KatrinaME</title>
		<link>http://storyassistant.com/2009/05/a-lesson-from-john-byrne/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>KatrinaME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storyassistant.com/?p=385#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Matt,

I think this is a good way for traditional media relations people to look at social media. 

Our objective is still the same (ultimately to help generate and maintain the good will of our clients).  However, the channels through which we do this have expanded. And really, that&#039;s ok. 

Remember when encyclopedias were sold door-to-door? I don&#039;t. But I could probably find out from an encyclopedia online. Encyclopedias are still available and they still perform the same function and they can still be sold door-to-door. But now we can access them in multiple formats that continue to change and improve. 

Such is true with the way people connect. And that changes the way media relations people connect with their audiences and build (yep) relationships. Call. Write. Tweet. Text. Just deliver the message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p>
<p>I think this is a good way for traditional media relations people to look at social media. </p>
<p>Our objective is still the same (ultimately to help generate and maintain the good will of our clients).  However, the channels through which we do this have expanded. And really, that&#8217;s ok. </p>
<p>Remember when encyclopedias were sold door-to-door? I don&#8217;t. But I could probably find out from an encyclopedia online. Encyclopedias are still available and they still perform the same function and they can still be sold door-to-door. But now we can access them in multiple formats that continue to change and improve. </p>
<p>Such is true with the way people connect. And that changes the way media relations people connect with their audiences and build (yep) relationships. Call. Write. Tweet. Text. Just deliver the message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
